Hi Joanna,
Just to confirm: in these plots, the Marker is on the Y-axis and the Event Length is on the X-axis? It's hard to tell without axis labels (and scales.....)
If so, you have a significant Freq difference between Top and Bottom. For example, CD3+ is 65% in Top, while it's 43% in Bottom. If Top and Bottom were truly the same, then they should have the same Freq.
Could you put the Event Length on a Linear scale (maybe 0-80)? The log (or asinh) scale makes it hard to see what's going on.
One possibility: if your nebulizer develops a partial clog to where it's deflecting the spray slightly, you can get your ion clouds to where they're not focused on the cone orifice (think throwing a dart at the edge of a dartboard, rather than the bullseye where you want it).
In most cases I've seen, this causes an overall drop in signal intensity across all channels (fewer ions getting in = fewer ions getting counted). However, you could imagine an edge case where the deflection is big enough to be noticeable in the data but not so bad as to give you *no* cells or *no* signal.
If that's the case, then the differences in Freq you see between Top and Bottom could be that not all of the cell events satisfy the EL and/or LCT lower thresholds and therefore aren't getting Counted (ie, cells aren't being written to the FCS file). If so, reprocessing the data with lower EL and/or LCT thresholds would get the Freq Parent to be consistent between Top and Bottom.
My *assumption* would be that the Bottom set is being undercounted. If so, the the Bottom would have a sharp edge on the left side of the EL distribution, whereas the Top would have a hotspot that would be a smooth distribution.
I also wonder if there might be *two* things happening here:
1. The Width issue, which in your first plots seems to be consistent over time (ie, Top and Bottom appear at all timepoints).
2. Whatever is causing the drop in EL vs time in your first plot, about 2/3 of the way through the Time. But which is happening to *both* Top and Bottom, consistently.
Aside: Brian and Adeeb's MMB book chapter (
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9454-0_2 ) goes into the definitions of Residual, Offset, Width, and Center. I think there's a Fluidigm notice about it too, but I could find the MMB chapter first.
If I'm reading Fig 7 correctly, Width = 20 * s.d. of the ion peak width (as measured in Pushes). So, having populations with two different Widths would imply having populations with two different ion peak widths.
Mike